Pressure-test the capital plan.
Turn due diligence, CapEx spreadsheets, inspections, maintenance history, and asset data into an evidence-backed view of capital exposure.
What gets uploaded
Start with the files your team already produces. Document imports are part of the professional pilot.
What Capital Review finds
FiveFourThree reconciles every plan line against the modeled view — deterministic rules, never AI-invented numbers — and ranks where your plan and the model disagree.
Capital Review — existing plan vs modeled view
DEMO DATAThe model places this 1985 original plumbing system near or beyond its typical range, but the current plan has no line for it. A site assessment would confirm scope.
Next evidence: site assessment
The plan assumes this roof is replaced in 2028; the modeled window starts earlier. A vendor estimate would firm up timing and cost.
Next evidence: vendor estimate
This plan line is an unverified assumption with no supporting vendor estimate or inspection on file.
Next evidence: vendor estimate
Two plan lines appear to cover the same water-heater replacement. Confirm which is current.
Next evidence: source document
Illustrative example. Deterministic comparison of your existing capital plan against the modeled view — modeled figures are ranges, never failure predictions, and your plan values are never overwritten.
Your existing plan is kept separate from the modeled outlook — never overwritten.
Existing plan vs FiveFourThree
FiveFourThree does not assume the existing plan is wrong. It shows where assumptions align, where they differ, and what evidence drives the difference — then ranks the findings by impact.
- Where is our capital exposure concentrated?
- Are reserves aligned with modeled needs?
- Where does our existing capital plan disagree with the model?
- Which plan assumptions are stale or unsupported?
- Which properties are driving future CapEx?
- Where are we relying on weak assumptions?
- What changes if actual repairs and replacements are entered?
Portfolio exposure
Demonstration data shown below — ranges, never fake precision.Reserve position
Top drivers
Evidence quality
Highest-exposure properties
Planned vs unplanned CapEx
Due diligence becomes the operating record
The deal model becomes the operating capital record.
The asset picture built during diligence keeps living after close. Repairs, replacements, actual costs, and new evidence update the record — and each new Capital Review compares your plan against the latest evidence, not the snapshot from underwriting.
Evidence & provenance
Every material assumption is traceable to its source — document, inspection, invoice, or owner input — with a confidence level attached.
FiveFourThree uses ranges and planning windows rather than pretending to know exact failure dates.
Multifamily & cohort support
Repeating assets — the 40 identical HVAC units, the water heaters across 120 doors — are modeled as cohorts scoped to buildings and units, so concentration shows up without forcing a row per unit on day one. Partial replacements never quietly reset a lifecycle; only confirmed full replacements do.
Decision-ready reporting
Every Capital Review finding carries a reason code, a severity, and the evidence that would resolve it — so the output is a queue to work, not a report to read. Findings can be acknowledged and resolved as evidence comes in.
Pressure-test your next deal.
Bring the plan you already have. FiveFourThree shows you where the evidence disagrees.